Monday, March 09, 2009

Minor Organizational Updates

Yesterday, I was browsing about the blog and elsewhere, and noticed that some things needed to be updated here. So, I've done so. The changes are mostly small and boring, like changing the display of the post archives (that list was getting rather long) and updating the copyright date on the bottom. However, I did make some changes to the "Other Blogs of Note" list. On the sad side, the Rensselaer Christian Association has not updated their blog for almost two years now, so I've pulled them off. The group itself and the RCA website are still alive and well, though, which is good. Taking its place in the list is Curious Cognitive Content, which I found had put up a link to the Post. It's always nice to be able to reciprocate, and Elle writes a very good blog, to boot (she even updates it regularly, unlike me!). So, it works out well.

One thing I thought about updating, but didn't, is the author description. It turns out I'm doing a lot right now, and keeping the summary short wasn't working out very well. This level of activity is probably also why I don't post as often as I'd like. Thanks for continuing to read what does make it up, though, and I hope that they're worth the wait. Until next time, God bless!

Saturday, March 07, 2009

Foolishnes! (1 Corinthians 1:18-31)

Sorry for the long gap in writing - the new year has found me officially in a second ministry, and, while it is a blessing and a thrill, it makes it even harder to find time and energy for writing. But, I had the opportunity a couple weeks ago to preach at church, when the pastor was out of town. Since I wrote out my first draft, I thought I might update that and share it. It's perhaps a bit more stream-of-consciousness than usual because of the genre, but I hope it comes across well enough. Enjoy!



It was the year 1781, and the Revolutionary War was drawing to a close. The main British Army had been trapped on a peninsula in Chesapeake Bay in Norfolk, Virginia. On the land side, they were cut off by an American and French army, under the command of George Washington. By sea, they were blockaded by a fleet of French warships. The British held out for a few days, but they were soon starved into submission, and the surrender documents were signed on October 19, 1781, effectively ending the war. To mark the occasion, the British military band (don't be besieged without one!) played a song that was both rather popular at the time and strangely appropriate, called “The World Turned Upside-Down”. And, in fact, when an army of the most power empire in the world was surrendering to a ragtag group of colonists, the world must have seemed just that way.

This is about the world being turned upside down; however, in a different way. For the past several weeks, the church has been talking about the prerequisites of evangelism, the important things that we need too understand, both in theory and in practice, if we're going to be engaged in sharing the gospel in the areas around us. This continues that line of discussion, but in a different direction. I want to consider our understanding of the Gospel itself, as described in 1 Corinthians 1:18-31 (which you may want to read).

The ancient church at Corinth was a rather troubled place. If you read through Paul's letters to them, or some of the writings of the early church fathers, it's evident that they tended to do a lot of infighting, mainly over matters of status and power. In this case, factions had been formed over which teachers should be honored the most – Peter, Paul, Apollos, even Jesus. Paul's immediate response to this was to go back to the basics of their belief – not restating the gospel, which they all knew well enough, but restating the context in which it was given. In so doing, he described three important, but non-obvious, attributes of the gospel that we can forget all too easily, to the peril of both ourselves and those whom we would bring to meet Jesus.

The first important thing that Paul tells us about the gospel is that it's purposefully counterintuitive – it's designed to be easily dismissed. Consider its focal point: a man dying naked, nailed to a couple of pieces of wood, meeting a cruel but far-too-common end to a short life. It's exactly the sort of end that should have prevented any sort of movement from starting, amongst either Jews or Gentiles. On the Jewish side, they knew what the Messiah would look like: he'd be the one riding in on the stallion, setting up a kingdom and ruling the earth for them. That's a far cry from a man crucified by their Roman conquerors, and in fact cursed by virtue of dying on a tree. So, it was plainly obvious that this must have been the wrong guy. Similarly, the Greeks knew all about logic and the supremacy of the gods, and would have been equally unconvinced by this god coming voluntarily to be a man, and then allowing himself to be killed. It's about as foolish as you can get. From the standpoint of everybody, then, this Christ is either impossible or lunacy – neither of which sounds like a very good belief option.

Now, of course, those of us who have believed this message may not see a conflict; we have answers that, to us, address the issue. For instance, we could reply to the Jewish objection that Christ did establish a kingdom, but it's invisible and not all here yet. He was cursed by dying on a tree, but that curse bought our pardon and then was canceled. We can agree with the Greek logician that it was crazy for Christ to die, but then again it was downright audacious for Him to rise again. And these are good answers. The problem is, they still don't prove anything. Indeed, they ask the scoffer to believe even more than he or she had to before! This is the problem, in fact, if I may be so bold, with the Christian obsession with apologetics, logical arguments and proofs of Christian beliefs. It's good to be able to answer genuine questions from people willing to believe, obviously. However, the gospel isn't designed so that you can take that same knowledge and argue someone into the Kingdom when their thinking is stuck in that worldly framework.

This brings us to our second important point. Why, you might ask, did God make make the gospel counterintuitive? Well, Paul gives us a very good answer – to humble us. No one could have guessed or figured out God's plan – even the disciples, who knew Jesus and were told the plan multiple times, weren't ready for it! Instead, if we are to understand it, it all has to be of God, so that it is God that is glorified, God that is followed, and God that is known. And this is how we come to faith, and through it obtain “a righteousness that is by faith from first to last.” (Romans 1:17 NIV) And, so, this humility is for our own good. Indeed, God's working of shame in people's lives in verses 27-29 ended up benefiting both the lowly and, apparently, a few of the wise, powerful, and noble. For both groups, the gospel can't be understood and accepted until the hearer is humble enough to accept it on God's terms, not their own.

Third, the gospel forces us to become radically Christ-centered. As was said above, the gospel is counterintuitive, requiring us to accept a new interpretation of God and the world. To do that, God must humble us to accept His explanation, even though it may not make sense. Once we've done this, we're suddenly in a rather alien place – an “upside-down world”, in fact. It's a place, as we read elsewhere [in the service], of camels jumping through needles (Matt. 19:23-26), of the first being last (Matt. 19:30), of men being honored with the angels (Psalm 8:3-8), and of mortals with eternity testified to in their hearts (Eccl. 3:11) – a world that defies understanding. Paul gives us one thing to cling to: Christ, and Him crucified (v. 23). He is the embodiment of God's power and grace, the only answer to sin, and the only thing we can boast in. Solomon said a similar thing back in Ecclesiastes (see Eccl. 3:9-15), that it's God who establishes, God who plans, and God who gives work. In other words, He and His word are the only way to understand how to live in God's “foolish” kingdom. It's a kingdom that involves, among other things, self-denial (Matt. 16:24), cheek-turning (Matt. 5:39), and enemy-loving (Luke 7:27-36). And these are things that He not only taught, but demonstrated in His time on earth.

To wrap this up, there's one fallacy in the this idea of “the world turned upside-down,” as it relates to the gospel: the world out there is already upside-down. When the gospel flips the world, it becomes not upside-down, but finally rightside-up. Or, to take it out of the metaphor, embracing the gospel means embracing the world, and ourselves, as God originally made us to be, instead of as the broken human beings we were born as due to sin. We are healed people, sent to still-broken people who often don't even know that they're broken. If we are to convince them, we need to first learn what it means to be a “little Christ”, through both relationship and study, and then, as we are able, begin to live and share it. As we do that, our lives themselves become the testimonies that will make the gospel make sense to other people. In other words, we are called, not to just preach the gospel, but to be it, through Christ working in us (Phil. 2:12-13). I pray that each of us would strive to reach that mark!




All content (c) 2005-09 Nathan I. Allen
Biblical quotes are from the English Standard Version, (c) 2001 by Crossway Bibles, unless otherwise noted

No sockpuppets were harmed in the making of this website.